Security Pacific National Bank Fails. FDIC Also Seized Franklin Bank

If you grew up in Los Angeles, and probably anywhere in California, you probably opened your first savings account at either Bank of America or Security Pacific National Bank. My family was a Security Pacific family. (In Los Angeles everything always seems to fall into a rivalry SC vs. UCLA, Dodger vs Angels SPNB vs BofA). When I was in high school, my first real job was as a teller working for Security Pacific – part of a high school training program. So I was a bit sad when Security Pacific merged away years ago, and pleased a couple of years ago when I found out the the old name and logo had been resurrected. I was looking for some help on some commercial property investments and was referred to Security Pacific to manage the investment. (I ended up investing in a Google building instead, but that’s a different story.) The Security Pacific executives seemed like pleasant and competent folks. I thought about them today, and was a bit disappointed for them, when I heard that they had crashed and been liquidated by the FDIC today.

security pacific national bank logo

security pacific national bank logo

Here’s the story from the associated press newswire:

WASHINGTON (AP) — Regulators shut down Houston-based Franklin Bank and Security Pacific Bank in Los Angeles on Friday, bringing the number of failures of federally insured banks this year to 19.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. was appointed receiver of Franklin Bank, which had $5.1 billion in assets and $3.7 billion in deposits as of Sept. 30, and of Security Pacific Bank, with $561.1 million in assets and $450.1 million in deposits as of Oct. 17.

The co-founder and chairman of parent Franklin Bank Corp., Lewis Ranieri, is credited with inventing mortgage-backed securities two decades ago, but apparently was unable to save his own company from getting ensnared in the home-loan bust.

The bank’s failure is a bitter irony because it is the mortgage securitization business of which Ranieri is known as a pioneer — the repackaging of home loans as bonds that are sold to investors — that was at the heart of the mortgage and credit crises. Last spring, the audit committee of the company’s board found in an investigation certain weaknesses in accounting, disclosure and other issues relating to residential real estate loans.

Franklin Bank Corp. just Sunday said it had received proposals for transactions to strengthen Franklin Bank’s capital position and was keeping regulators informed of the talks’ progress.

The FDIC said all of Franklin Bank’s deposits will be assumed by Prosperity Bank of El Campo, Texas. Its 46 offices will reopen as branches of Prosperity Bank with their normal business hours, including those that open on Saturday. In addition to assuming Franklin Bank’s deposits, Prosperity Bank also will acquire about $850 million of the failed bank’s assets.

Parent company Franklin Bank Corp. just Sunday said it had received proposals for transactions to strengthen Franklin Bank’s capital position and was keeping regulators informed of the talks’ progress.

Meanwhile, all of Security Pacific’s deposits will be assumed by Pacific Western Bank of Los Angeles. Its four offices will reopen Monday as branches of Pacific Western, a unit of PacWest Bancorp. In addition, Pacific Western will purchase around $51.8 million of Security Pacific’s assets.

The FDIC will retain the remaining assets of the two banks for eventual sale.

The agency said depositors of Franklin Bank and Security Pacific Bank will continue to have full access to their deposits, which will continue to be insured by the FDIC.

The FDIC estimated that the resolution of Franklin Bank will cost the federal deposit insurance fund between $1.4 billion and $1.6 billion, while that of Security Pacific Bank will cost the fund $210 million.

Regular deposit accounts are now insured up to $250,000 as part of the new financial rescue law enacted in early October. The limit on individual retirement accounts held in banks remains at $250,000.

The 19 bank failures so far this year compare with three for all of 2007 and are more than in the previous five years combined. It’s expected that many more banks won’t survive the next year of economic tumult. The pressures of tumbling home prices, rising mortgage foreclosures and tighter credit have been battering many banks, large and small, across the nation.

The failures this year include that of Seattle-based thrift Washington Mutual Inc. in late September, the biggest bank collapse in history. It had $307 billion in assets. In July another big savings and loan, IndyMac Bank based in Pasadena, Calif., failed and was seized by regulators with about $32 billion in assets.

The FDIC estimates that through 2013 there will be about $40 billion in losses to the deposit insurance fund, including an $8.9 billion loss from the failure of IndyMac Bank. The FDIC is raising insurance premiums paid by banks and thrifts to replenish its fund, which now stands at around $45.2 billion, below the minimum target level set by Congress and the lowest level since 2003.

In addition, the FDIC may guarantee nearly $2 trillion in U.S. banks’ debt and deposit accounts in an effort to break the crippling logjam in bank-to-bank lending.

Well over half of the roughly 8,500 federally-insured banks and savings and loans are expected to tap the FDIC’s temporary guarantees. The agency will provide as much as $1.4 trillion in insurance for more than three years for loans between banks, guaranteeing the new debt in the event the issuing bank fails or its holding company files for bankruptcy.

Of the 8,500 FDIC-insured banks, 117 were considered to be in trouble in the second quarter — the highest level in about five years and up from 90 in the first quarter. The agency doesn’t disclose the banks’ names.

Franklin Bank customers seeking more information can contact the FDIC toll-free at 1-800-591-2845. Security Pacific Bank customers can call 1-866-934-8944.

Interest Rates are Falling but Banks aren’t Lending

It’s helpful to remember that ours is a market economy. That means that economic decisions aren’t forced from the top by a government bureaucrat, but rather the reasoned (or sometimes emotional) decisions of millions of individual consumers, business executives, bankers, marketers etc. Reports from a number of sources today hint that even with the push of substantial capital into the marketplace, many businesses are reluctant to borrow, and many lenders are still hesitant to lend. With uncertainty in the real estate market throwing valuations and appraisals off kilter, its hard for lenders and borrowers to strike a deal. General economic uncertainty and the spector of unemployment or business declins, brings into question the ongoing financial stability of potential borrowers.

All in all a situation that needs to unwind through the decisions of millions not just a handful in Washington, Wall street or London.

Home Mortgage Lending - image courtesy of GreekShares.ComHere’s what CNNMoney has to say about it.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — Lending rates fell again Friday, but as the cost of borrowing eases, some government data suggest private lending is not expanding.

The 3-month Libor rate dropped to 2.29% from 2.39% on Thursday, according to Dow Jones, marking the rate’s lowest point since Nov. 12, 2004.

The overnight Libor rate held steady at 0.33%, according to Bloomberg.com. The overnight rate is just a hundredth of a percentage point above the all-time low.

About a month ago, 3-month Libor was at 4.82%, and the overnight rate was at an all-time high of 6.88%. Lower rates are a major boost for the strangled credit markets because more than $350 trillion in assets are tied to Libor.

A number of U.S. government programs aimed at easing funding concerns for banks and encouraging lending between financial institutions have also helped lower Libor rates. Such initiatives include lowering interest rates, injecting capital into banks and providing insurance on all non-interest bearing accounts.

Falling Libor rates are “a very important ingredient” in the recipe for economic recovery, said Michael Strauss, chief economist at financial research firm Commonfund.

“Improvement in the Libor market is an important first step towards getting banks to act like banks again,” Strauss said.

As financial institutions become more confident in lending to each other, they will become more willing to lend to businesses and consumers, according to Strauss.

But with the economy likely in a recession, some indications show the Federal Reserve’s programs and lower rates have not yet encouraged banks and free market investors to lend to businesses.

The Fed announced Thursday that it lent another $100 billion to companies over the past week through a new short-term funding program. In its so-called Commercial Paper Funding Facility, the Fed has provided critical short-term financing to businesses and financial institutions in desperate need of cash.

But in a separate report, Fed data showed the market for commercial paper expanded by just $50.5 billion. Even as the Fed’s program has dragged down borrowing rates, the difference of $49.5 billion between the Fed’s injection and the market’s growth suggests that the commercial paper market would have contracted without the Fed’s involvement.

Read the rest of the story here