Here are some examples of how costs might differ if you refinanced your home mortgage loan.

Case 1: California

600,000 home, purchased in 2004, with a 450,000 mortgage at 5.625
Currently paying: $2,590.45/month.
Principal: $599.34
Interest: $1,991.11
Current Loan Balance: $424,171.84

What’s left: 424,000 plus 383,000 in interest over 26 years.

If you Refinance for 30 years at 5.30, here’s what you would face:
Monthly Payment: $2,354.49
Monthly Principal: $481.82
Monthly Interest: $1,872.67
What’s left: 424,000 plus 424,000 in interest over 30 years.

You get to drop your monthly payments, but because the loan is stretching out over an extra four years, you end up paying an extra 41000 in interest over the life of the loan. Plus you have any additional closing costs and refinancing costs to put the new loan in place.

If you instead continued to make your payments at 2590 per month, at the new interest rates, you would pay of the loan in 292 months, about 24 years and spend a total of 424000 plus 331,000 in interest. a net savings of over 50,000 from the original loan and almost 100000 over the new loan.

Here’s a page with some mortgage calculators from Homecomings.Com. As part of GMAC they just got bailed out and have plenty of money to spend.

ShareThis

If you find yourself five years into a thirty year mortgage and lenders start dangling lower interest rates, is it worth it to bite? Well it depends on your circumstance, but sometimes it isn’t. Many mortgages are front loaded on interest payment. It is only when you are five or six years into the loan that you start to see significant principal paydown. It is often possible to put yourself in a worse position to swap to a nominally lower interest loan if you are going to face higher fees and costs up front and put yourself back into a position of paying mostly interest in the first few years of the new note.

Here’s a timely article from the New York Times on the subject:

Because the typical mortgage only lasts for about five or six years before the homeowner sells the home or refinances the loan, lenders collect much of the mortgage interest during those years. Once a loan gets beyond five or six years old, homeowners can start seeing the overall debt drop at a faster pace.

So if a homeowner has reached that point, does it make sense to start a new 30-year loan, and face another five years where you’ll make heavier interest payments? The answer, as is so often the case with financial decisions, depends on individual circumstances. If retirement or tuition payment plans involve the liquidation of a home, it may make sense not to take out a new loan.

But in other cases, the monthly savings from a cheaper mortgage could be critical — “especially in this economy,” said Richard E. Austin, a financial adviser with Lincoln Financial Advisors.

Mr. Austin, who is based in Rye Brook, N.Y., noted that someone who five years ago borrowed $220,000 on a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage at 5.5 percent would have reduced the loan principal to only $203,500, despite having made nearly $75,000 in payments during that time. From this point forward, the principal would shrink more quickly, but if the borrower could reduce the interest rate to, say, 5 percent, the monthly mortgage payment would drop by $157, to $1,092. Assuming it costs $3,000 to close that new loan, it would take just 27 months to recoup the costs if the borrower is in the 28 percent tax bracket.

If a homeowner planned on keeping the new loan for 27 months or longer, a refinance could well make sense, Mr. Austin and other mortgage advisers said. The federal government has floated the idea of engineering a 4.5 percent mortgage rate, by promising to buy mortgages at those rates, but that proposal was only targeted at loans made for a home purchase, not a refinance. Mortgage rates in late December were at their lowest level since at least 1971, when Freddie Mac began tracking these loans.

Closing costs vary widely in the New York area. Borrowers in Manhattan, for instance, face much higher mortgage taxes than those in the suburbs, so the financial calculus of a refinance decision shifts accordingly.

Mr. Austin, who is also a tax lawyer, said another frequently overlooked factor could help reduce the cost of a refinancing. If the new bank agreed to essentially absorb the old loan — albeit with new terms — the homeowner might not face a mortgage origination tax on the new loan. So when shopping for the new loan, he said, borrowers should ask if the lender will perform a “consolidation and assignment” with the old loan. Be sure to ask, or the lender may not offer it.

For those averse to the idea of starting the 30-year clock anew, Mr. Austin suggests splitting the monthly payment — making half at the middle of the month and saving the other half for the actual due date. That strategy, he said, can take years off the new loan’s payoff term.

Another cost savings strategy is to negotiate a new lower mortgage, but continue to pay the old rate. If you have 2500 monthly payment with 300 dollars going to principal, and reduce your required payment to 2200 but continued to pay 2500 you would in effect double the amount of principal you are repaying and could take many years off of the length of the mortgage.

ShareThis

“It is imperative that Americans are better educated about their finances and understand what it takes to be a responsible homeowner,” said HUD Secretary Steve Preston. “The resources on the website allow families to plan ahead to make smart choices about their finances and homebuying decisions.”

The new site provides a wide-range of information about all avenues needed to be successful on the road to greater financial education, including:

* Building a Financial Foundation;
* Sustaining Healthy Homeownership; and
* Achieving Financial Security.

One of the most unique features of this website is the Self-Assessment Tool. The Self-Assessment Tool provides an extensive guide to help users learn more about personalized options for purchasing and/or refinancing their home. Users will be prompted to answer a few questions. Based on the answers given, the Self-Assessment Tool lists numerous links to visit on-line to learn more about the necessary and correct steps to own a home, refinance a home, enhance their financial skills, and much more.

Some of the other links on My Money, My Home, My Future give detailed information about:

* 9 Steps to Buying a Home
* Housing Counselors and Lenders
* Banking, Credit and Building Wealth
* Foreclosure Process and Alternatives
* Refinancing Loans and FHA Insured Loans

ShareThis

You already own a home, so you’re at least somewhat familiar with the mortgage process. You now want to refinance your mortgage and are considering an FHA-insured mortgage. You’ll find out that refinancing through FHA is the same as applying for any other loan, plus you have many more protections and it’s easier to get qualified with FHA.

First, determine what kind of loan you already have

If you already have an FHA-insured loan, you have a few more options for refinancing than if you than if you have a conventional or other non-FHA loan. Ask your lender.

Second, determine what you’re trying to do

Are you looking to take advantage of lower interest rates? Are you looking to consolidate some credit card debt or a home equity loan into one single mortgage? Are you looking to take cash out of your property? Your refinancing goals will determine what kind of refinance loan you want to apply for.

Third, figure out how much you can afford

What you can afford depends on your income, credit rating, current monthly expenses, down payment and the interest rate. There are some online tools you can use, and some tools that your real estate agent can help you with, but it’s best to visit an FHA-approved lender to find out for sure.

You should remember that prequalification (an informal estimate of how much you might borrow) is just to give you a preliminary idea of what you can afford, and to identify any major problems that you will want to fix. It’s not a guarantee that you will be approved for a loan-but you will want to get pre-qualified to avoid any surprises.
Get your home Inspected

State regulatory authorities. Some states require licensing of home inspectors.
Professional organizations. Professional organizations may require home inspectors to pass tests and meet minimum qualifications before becoming a member.
Phone book Yellow Pages. Look under “Building Inspection Service” or “Home Inspection Service”.
The Internet. Search for “Building Inspection Service” or “Home Inspection Service.”
Your real estate agent. Most real estate professionals have a list of home inspectors they recommend.

Fourth, shop for a loan
Save money by doing your homework. Talk to several lenders, compare interest rates, and negotiate or bargain to get a better deal. Consider getting pre-approved for a loan.

Why ask for an FHA-insured mortgage loan? There are many reasons to ask your lender for an FHA-insured loan instead of a conventional loan or an expensive, risky subprime loan.

• Lower cost - FHA-insured loans have competitive interest rates because the the Federal Government backs the loans. Always compare an FHA-insured loan with other loan types.
• Smaller downpayment - The FHA offers a low 3% downpayment, and that money can come from a family member, employer or charitable organization. Many other loans don’t allow this.
• Easier to qualify - Because the FHA insures your mortgage, lenders are more willing to give loans with lower qualifying requirements, so it’s easier for you to qualify.
• Less than perfect credit - Even if you have had credit problems, such as bankruptcy, it’s easier for you to qualify for an FHA-insured loan than a conventional loan because FHA insures your mortgage.
• More protection to keep your home - The FHA has been around since 1934 and will continue to be here to protect you. Should you encounter hard times after buying your home, the FHA has many options to help keep you in your home and avoid foreclosure.

ShareThis

Should you be doing the same?

The depends mainly on what rate you have now and whether you’re planning to move anytime soon. Experts advise taking a careful look at your options before you jump in.

Mortgage brokers were quoting rates as low as 4.5 percent to 4.6 percent this week, a day after the Federal Reserve took extraordinary steps to boost the troubled U.S. housing market and slumping economy. The national average on 30-year fixed mortgages stood at 5.18 percent on Thursday, just over Wednesday’s average of 5.06 percent, which was the lowest number since the early 1960s, according to financial publisher HSH Associates.

Here are some answers to common questions about refinancing mortgages.

Q: How much does refinancing cost?

A: It can cost several thousand dollars, but there are ways to make upfront charges invisible to the borrower.

Typically there is a fee that goes to the mortgage broker or lender, plus fees for title insurance, a new appraisal, document processing and other charges. Often, mortgage brokers or lenders can create the appearance of a “no fee” mortgage by adding the costs to a total loan amount or charging a higher interest rate.

Q: So will refinancing my home save me money?

A: That depends on how soon you want to sell.

Let’s say you have a $200,000 loan. If you’re able to cut your rate from 6 percent to 5 percent, your monthly payment will drop from about $1,200 to about $1,075, so you’ll be saving $125 a month. If you have refinancing fees of $3,000, it would take two years to break even — so the refinancing deal is worth it only if you plan to stay in your place longer than that.

“Don’t get stars in your eyes based strictly on the interest rate or based on how much money you think you’re going to be saving every month,” said Kevin Iverson, owner of Reed Mortgage in Denver. If it doesn’t make economic sense, he says, “don’t do it.”

Q: What kinds of loans are out there these days?

A: Your options are far more limited than just a few years ago. The most attractive rates are on the most traditional loans: 15-year and 30-year fixed rate mortgages, and loans for borrowers who have at least 20 percent in a down payment or existing home equity.

Q: What are some common pitfalls?

A: Mortgage brokers are paid by lenders and therefore have the incentive to complete a deal. Not all brokers are dishonest, but unscrupulous ones may try to steer you into a loan that doesn’t actually improve your financial situation.

“There needs to be benefit in doing the transaction,” said Scott Gormley, owner of Oak Valley Mortgage in Chico, Calif. “It can’t be where the broker is just going to make a buck.”

Q: What’s the difference between a loan modification and a refinanced loan?

A: Loan modifications are for borrowers who are behind on their mortgage. They involve a reduction in the interest rate or a temporary break on payments. By contrast, a refinanced loan is an entirely new mortgage, often made with a different lender, with a new loan that will last either 15 or 30 years.

Q: My existing loan has a prepayment penalty that could cost me thousands of dollars. Should I still refinance?

A: Many of the riskier loans that were made during the housing boom carry prepayment penalties. However, many lenders are willing to waive those penalties and allow borrowers to refinance with another lender if doing so prevents foreclosure, said Scott Stern, chief executive of Lenders One Mortgage Cooperative, a national alliance of 140 mortgage bankers.

“If they let you refinance, they’ll lose the loan, but they won’t lose any money,” he said.

Q: If everybody wants to refinance at once, can the lending industry handle the rush?

A: There could be a backlog as applications surge, especially because thousands of workers have been laid off across the mortgage industry over the past 18 months.

While a refinancing boom is great news for the beleaguered mortgage business, “the industry as a whole is not quite prepared,” said Keith Gumbinger, a senior vice president with HSH Associates.

ShareThis

Here’s the circumstance: if you fall far enough behind on paying your federal income taxes, either personally, or as a small businessperson, the IRS can file a Tax Lien against all of your personal property. That includes your house. And that tax lien takes precedence over your mortgage. That means the IRS can seize your home and sell it to cover your tax debt. If there isn’t enough money to pay back the lender, they are just out of luck. Unfortunately, that means no lender will want to carry a mortgage on your home. Which means you can’t possibly refinance your way out of an exploding mortgage and into a nice new safe mortgage.

Today the IRS announced that they are willing to “subordinate” their lien to your mortgage. If the house gets sold, the lender is protected and gets to go first. The IRS has over 1 million current tax liens against US residents, so a lot of families got a load of relief today.

Read more about the story here at the Journal or here in the IRS Newsroom

ShareThis

More room to fall?

For every $100 spent on a house in 1950 the investment rose slightly through 2002, then soared to about $192 in 2006, adjusting for inflation. Then credit dried up, and the bust began.

Rick Wallick moved into a new, three-bedroom $200,000 home in Maricopa, Ariz., in October 2005. Today, the home is worth $80,000.

The disabled software engineer stopped making mortgage payments this month. His $70,000 down payment is now worthless. His dream house will be foreclosed on next year.

“We’re so far underwater it’s not funny,” says Wallick, 57, who had to return to his original home in Oregon to care for a sick family member and tend to his own medical problems. Wallick, one of the hardest-hit victims in one of the states hit hardest by the housing crisis, lost 60% of his home’s value in three years.

His story is an extreme example, but home values have fallen so sharply since hitting a historic peak in the spring of 2006 that many Americans are wondering how much more prices can sink.

As painful as the decline has been, history suggests home values still may have a long way to drop and may take decades to return to the heights of 2½ years ago.

“We will never see these prices again in our lifetime, when you adjust for inflation,” says Peter Schiff, president of investment firm Euro Pacific Capital of Darien, Conn. “These were lifetime peaks.”

The boom in home prices — fueled by heavily leveraged loans built on low or even no down payments — made it easy to forget that housing values had been remarkably stable for a half-century after World War II, rising at roughly the same pace as income and inflation. Prices soared in most of the country — especially in Arizona, California, Florida and Nevada and metro areas of Washington, D.C., and New York — during a brief period of easy lending, especially from 2002 to 2006. That era’s over.

So far, home values nationally have tumbled an average of 19% from their peak. As bad as that is, prices would need to fall as least 17% more to reach their traditional relationship to household income, according to a USA TODAY analysis of home prices since 1950. In that scenario, a $300,000 house in 2006 could be worth about $200,000 when real estate prices hit bottom.

The price plunge has wiped out trillions of dollars in home equity and caused the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Susan Wachter, professor of real estate at the University of Pennsylvania, fears that foreclosures and tight credit could send home prices falling to the point that millions of families and thousands of banks are thrust into insolvency.

“Homes are different than other goods and services,” she says. “The fragility of our banking system is tied to the value of homes.”

Home values have fallen before — during the Great Depression and in Texas after a 1980s oil boom, for example — but those drops were a response to other economic forces. This time, the housing price collapse is the cause of the nation’s broad economic troubles, not just an effect.

“If we have another 20% decline in prices, we’ll need another bailout of banks similar to what we just did,” Wachter says.

Other economists see a brighter picture in the long term. Wachovia economist Adam York expects home values to keep falling until 2010 but is optimistic they will recover.

“The one saving grace is the population is growing by 3 million people a year,” he says. “They need to live somewhere. That means more roofs.”

Until recently, homes were stable, unspectacular investments, not get-rich-quick schemes.

Nationally, the typical existing home was worth roughly the same in 2000 as it was in 1950, after adjusting for inflation, according to Yale University economist Robert Shiller.

Newly built homes generally were bigger and more expensive than older houses. As time passed, that meant Americans lived in larger, more valuable homes overall. But a house, once constructed, grew slowly in value. California in the 1970s, Texas in the 1980s and Florida on-and-off for a century were conspicuous exceptions to the rule.

Despite only modest increases in value, homes were smart investments. Owners lived in a house, then got their money back when they sold. That’s a better deal than renting. Borrowers got tax breaks, too, and built equity that could be leveraged into bigger houses as their incomes grew.

From 2002 to 2006, houses went from being a tortoise to a hare in the investment world. Home sale profits and relaxed lending standards such as lower down payment requirements and adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) made it possible for buyers of all income levels to pay more for houses.

When the housing bubble began to deflate in 2006, history had a sobering lesson to teach. Home values had closely tracked three common-sense measures for many years:

•Income — Home values floated at about three times average household income from 1950 to 2000. In 2006, the average household income was $66,500. Under the traditional model, home prices should have been about $200,000. Instead, the typical home sold for $301,000.

•Rent — Homes traditionally have sold for about 20 times what it would cost to rent them for a year. In 2006, houses were selling for 32 times annual rent.

•Appreciation — Existing homes grew in value by less than 0.5% per year, after adjusting for inflation, from 1950 to 2000. From 2000 to 2006, home prices rose at an average annualized rate of 8.2% above inflation and peaked with a 12.3% jump in 2005. Housing prices began to fall in the second quarter of 2006.

Inflation could help homes recapture their old prices, if not their value. But when inflation is factored in, home prices might not return to their 2006 peak for many years. Housing prices are meaningless if you don’t adjust for inflation, says Schiff, the investment manager.

He points out that gold peaked in 1980 at $850 an ounce in response to inflation and the Iranian hostage crisis. It never recovered. Today, it sells for about $750 an ounce and would have to top $2,000 an ounce when adjusted for inflation to match its value in 1980.

“That’s the nature of bubbles,” Schiff says. “The price never comes back.”

An extreme relaxation of lending standards inflated the housing bubble.

“Shoddy underwriting on mortgages” is the primary cause of the housing crisis, says York, the Wachovia economist. “People got caught off-guard by how bad it was.”

Millions of home buyers — poor, rich and middle class — were approved to buy homes at prices that had been out-of-reach just a few years earlier. Lenders offered low introductory “teaser” rates on adjustable rate mortgages and approved borrowers based on artificially low mortgage payments, not the higher ones that took effect later.

What else changed:

•Optional payments on principal — In 2005, 29% of new mortgages allowed borrowers to pay interest only — not principal — or pay less than the interest due and add the cost to the principal. That was up from 1% in 2001, according to Credit Suisse, an investment bank.

• No verification of income — Half of mortgages generated in 2006 required no or minimal documentation of household income, reports Credit Suisse.

•Tiny down payments — In 1989, the average down payment for first-time home buyers was 10%, reports the National Association of Realtors. In 2007, it was 2%.

Low down payments and ARMs gave homeowners enormous financial leverage to pay high home prices. Leverage boosts buying power through debt, the same way a 100-pound woman uses a lever to jack up a 3,000-pound car.

Consider a couple with $20,000 cash. In 2006, they easily could get a 5% down mortgage to buy a $400,000 house. Today, a 10% down payment would limit the couple to a $200,000 house.

“Leverage matters a lot when you buy a house,” says University of Wisconsin economist Morris Davis, an expert on housing prices and rents. “We’re not going to go back to the days of only 20% (down payment) mortgages, but the days of putting nothing down are long gone.”

Easy access to borrowed money reset all housing prices, even those paid by cautious borrowers. People of all income classes moved up a notch, Census Bureau housing data show.

The sale of new homes costing $750,000 or more quadrupled from 2002 to 2006. The construction of inexpensive homes costing $125,000 or less fell by two-thirds. The biggest boom was in the middle. Homes costing $200,000 to $300,000 became affordable to millions of families.

The failed titans of home lending — Countrywide Financial, IndyMac Bank and Washington Mutual — specialized in high-risk, highly leveraged loans.

“The price correction has been severe, rapid and probably permanent because lending standards have changed,” says mortgage credit analyst Suzanne Mistretta, a senior director at Fitch Ratings, a bond rating company. “We are not going to see 2006 peak levels for a very, very long time.”

The Great Depression of the 1930s was preceded by a real estate bubble, also fueled by loose lending standards and shrinking down payment requirements. Those real estate problems — and solutions — echo today’s.

Florida real estate was the epicenter of speculation in the mid-1920s. Developers ran up prices by selling to borrowers who put as little as 10% down. Those were shockingly risky loans at a time when the standard mortgage lasted five years and required a 50% down payment.

The risky loans went bad first, but it was the spread of credit problems to the supposedly safe loans — five years and 50% down — that caused the housing market to collapse.

The five-year loans required no payments to reduce principal. Homeowners expected to refinance mortgages when the loans expired, usually with the same lender. The stock market crash led to a “liquidity crisis” — no money to borrow — that dried up mortgage refinancing.

Millions of families lost their homes to foreclosure. Falling prices on nearly everything — homes, farm crops, wages — made consumers reluctant to buy and banks afraid to lend.

As part of the New Deal, the government took control of millions of loans and restructured them into something new: the modern mortgage, with 20% down and principal that is repaid over the life of the loan. The government extended the mortgages to 15 years, then 25 and finally 30.

When World War II ended in 1945 and the Baby Boom began the following year, the 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage became a cornerstone of society and led to unprecedented levels of homeownership.

This resilient home finance system should recover in a few years, some analysts say.

National Association of Realtors chief economist Lawrence Yun predicts home prices will keep falling in 2009 but could return to their 2006 peak in three years, not counting inflation.

He says the bubble largely was confined to four states — California, Nevada, Florida and Arizona. “People who bought at the peak in those states will need time for prices to recover, even up to five years,” he says. Yun says people who buy now “have much less risk of price declines and a great possibility of price gains.”

The danger of rapidly falling home prices is that — similar to the Depression — potential buyers and lenders will stay away, fueling even sharper price declines.

During the housing boom, buyers expected prices to rise, so they were quick to buy, borrow and pay a premium. As prices drop, home buyers wait for better deals. says economist Dean Baker of the liberal Center for Economic Policy Research in Washington, D.C.

Lenders want bigger down payments to protect against the falling value of collateral. Homeowners lose equity, so they can’t buy other houses. “Price declines can be a self-reinforcing mechanism,” Wachter says.

An out-of-control price collapse would have dire consequences, Baker says. Even the most conservative banks would find themselves carrying portfolios of toxic mortgage loans.

If housing prices don’t stabilize at traditional levels, financial troubles could spread everywhere — to credit cards, car loans and commercial mortgages, Baker says. “The waves of bad debt will just keep coming,” he says.

Baker and Wachter want the U.S. government to take aggressive steps to help homeowners, not just financial institutions. They support expanding programs that restructure troubled mortgages to prevent a flood of foreclosed homes from coming on the market and driving prices below their traditional level.

Rick Wallick is an example of how even cautious borrowers can be hurt by a price collapse. He made a 35% down payment on his house and got a 15-year, fixed-rate mortgage at 5.75%.

Arizona’s real estate mess wiped him out anyway. Now that he’s in Oregon, he’s renting out his Arizona house at a loss and can’t afford to keep two homes.

Wallick’s Arizona house is surrounded by countless foreclosed homes and empty lots. He told his mortgage company that his December payment will be his last. “It may ruin my credit rating, but I can still buy food,” he says.

Shelley McComb used a no-money-down, interest-only ARM to pay $199,000 in December 2006 for a new three-bedroom home near Birmingham, Ala. The house’s assessed value briefly rose to $225,000.

Now, she needs to move to Atlanta where her husband got a promotion. The McCombs put their home up for sale in March. After getting no offers, they dropped their price to $179,000. They’d settle for $160,000.

Shelley McComb, 30, who manages a doggie day care center, says, “I wish we’d rented.”

ShareThis

Flexible payment loans, called Option ARMs are adjustable rate mortgages with several flexible payment options. Generally they allow a homeowner to make a full payment according to a standard payoff schedule, or to pay only the interest with no payment towards the loans principal, or even a lesser “negative amortization” amount which would allow some of the interest owed to add to the original principal. These loans existed for only one reason, to create a lower initial payment structure to allow a buyer to acquire a property that she couldn’t afford. Unfortunately, the low payments always had a sunset provision, in the case of many homeowners, a true drop dead provision. At the end of two years or perhaps three, the loans would reset to the higher full payoff paced payment which the borrower generally couldn’t afford. The only possible salvation to a homeowner in these time bomb loans was to refinance or sell. In a down market, with tight credit, these homeowners are facing a perfect storm with no way out. The risk was never a mystery, it was just ignored.

Warnings came from all sides of the mortgage market.

We expect to see a huge increase in defaults, delinquencies and foreclosures as a result of the over selling of these products,” Kevin Stein, associate director of the California Reinvestment Coalition, wrote to regulators in 2006. The group advocates on housing and banking issues for low-income and minority residents.

But bankers, afraid of having their opportunities limited fought the regulations. “To conclude that ‘nontraditional’ equates to higher risk does not appropriately balance risk and compensating factors of these products,” said Lilian Gavin, the Chief Investment Officer of Downey Savings which carried over 50% of its loan portfolio in these products. Downey insisted these loans were safe — maybe even safer than traditional 30-year mortgages.

In 2005, faced with ominous signs the housing market was in jeopardy, bank regulators proposed new guidelines for banks writing risky loans. Today, in the midst of the worst housing recession in a generation, the proposal reads like a list of what-ifs:

_Regulators told bankers exotic mortgages were often inappropriate for buyers with bad credit.

_Banks would have been required to increase efforts to verify that buyers actually had jobs and could afford houses.

_Regulators proposed a cap on risky mortgages so a string of defaults wouldn’t be crippling.

_Banks that bundled and sold mortgages were told to be sure investors knew exactly what they were buying.

_Regulators urged banks to help buyers make responsible decisions and clearly advise them that interest rates might skyrocket and huge payments might be due sooner than expected.

Those proposals all were stripped from the final rules. None required congressional approval or the president’s signature.

“In hindsight, it was spot on,” said Jeffrey Brown, a former top official at the Office of Comptroller of the Currency, one of the first agencies to raise concerns about risky lending.

Unfortunately for the rest of us, the regulators bent to the banks and the financial fallout has trashed everything.

ShareThis

As 2008 comes to an end, we are starting to see corrections in the Home Loan Mortgage Lending market. Over the last weeks of November Fed actions to bring interest rates down as low as 5.5% on 30 year home loans combined with a 15 to 20 percent drop in the average cost of housing have worked to bring affordablity of housing way up. Read more about it here at FoxNews.

ShareThis

“The feds agreed to spend a half a trillion dollars to buy up mortgage backed securities and another $100 billion to fund lending for Fannie and Freddie; we’re not talking chump change anymore,” said Keith Gumbinger of HSH Associates, a publisher of mortgage information.

Rates averaged 5.77% for the day on a 30-year, fixed rate loan, down from 6.06% Monday, according to Gumbinger. They fell as far as 0.75 percentage points during the day, according to Orawin Velz, Associate Vice President for Economic Forecasting at the Mortgage Bankers Association.

That could save a typical homebuyer more than $90 a month on a $200,000 mortgage.

“The government action was geared to bringing mortgage rates down,” said Velz, “and it did.”

The drop was the largest since early September, when the administration announced that it was taking control of mortgage giants Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500) and Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500), and stemmed from similar market sentiment.

Both actions sought to give confidence to the investment community. Most mortgages are sold to investors in so-called secondary markets but with foreclosure rates so high and expensive write downs of mortgage-backed securities so common over the past several months, investors had fled the mortgage market.

Instead of buying mortgage bonds, they’ve been snapping up Treasurys, a virtually risk-free investment. That showed up in the falling yields of Treasury bonds and the greater difference between Treasury yields and mortgage interest rates.

ShareThis